We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement. In order for us to review and merge your code, add yourself to the .clabot file as contributor, as a way of signing the CLA.

Thanks for the contribution!
Upon reviewing there's an issue with the general idea: basically, I don't think a generic "show redirect" is enough for this. Instead, I think the check should be per-URL.
There is already a "Hide from dashboard" option in URL, but the URLs that are redirect are ignored.
I think the PR should make it so redirects URLs are not ignored, but "hide from dashboard" is true by default when creating a redirect
I am just not exactly sure how to implement this because when you reach the form to create a URL, the ttoe gas bit been selected yet

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement. In order for us to review and merge your code, add yourself to the .clabot file as contributor, as a way of signing the CLA.

Thanks for the contribution! Upon reviewing there's an issue with the general idea: basically, I don't think a generic "show redirect" is enough for this. Instead, I think the check should be per-URL. There is already a "Hide from dashboard" option in URL, but the URLs that are redirect are ignored. I think the PR should make it so redirects URLs are not ignored, but "hide from dashboard" is true by default when creating a redirect I am just not exactly sure how to implement this because when you reach the form to create a URL, the ttoe gas bit been selected yet

I get what you're saying, then by this logic, changing the URL mode automatically decides the base value for HideFromDashboard, so I've implemented a simple onChange method for when a user changes the URL mode.
Now HideFromDashboard is automatically selected / deselected depending on the mode (selected if mode is redirect), the user can change this afterwards.
Also removed the auto-skip URL on homepage.

What do you say?

Yes that looks better thanks! Could you remove the condition with the skip altogether? I dont think it will be required anymore since the value is always false
then it should be ready to merge

We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement. In order for us to review and merge your code, add yourself to the .clabot file as contributor, as a way of signing the CLA.

Yes that looks better thanks! Could you remove the condition with the skip altogether? I dont think it will be required anymore since the value is always false then it should be ready to merge

Done, is this what you meant?